Euclid's WorkshopBook I
← Back to Propositions
Proposition 9 of 48 Construction

To bisect a given rectilinear angle.

Given any angle, construct a line that divides it into two equal parts.

Before You Read

Grab a compass and straightedge. Someone draws an angle on your paper—any angle. Can you split it exactly in half without a protractor? No measuring allowed, just the compass and straight edge. Think about what tools you've built so far: equilateral triangles, length copying, and SSS congruence.

Browse All Foundations
Browse All Propositions

All Propositions

Basic Constructions (5)
Triangle Fundamentals (5)
Perpendiculars & Angles (5)
Exterior Angles & Inequalities (5)
Interior Triangles & Angle Copying (5)
Parallel Lines (5)
Parallel Constructions & Parallelograms (5)
Area Theorems (5)
Area Applications (4)
Grand Finale (4)
A B C D E F

What Euclid Is Doing

Setup: We have ∠BAC and want to find a line from A that splits it exactly in half.

Approach: The strategy is beautifully simple: manufacture two triangles that share the bisector line AF, then prove they're congruent by SSS. Here's how: mark equal distances along both sides of the angle (AD = AE), then build an equilateral triangle on DE to get a point F where DF = EF. Now triangles ADF and AEF share side AF, have AD = AE and DF = EF—three matching pairs of sides. SSS forces them to be congruent, so the angles at A must be equal. The bisector falls out automatically.

Conclusion: Here's why AF bisects the angle: We construct points D and E with AD = AE (by Prop 3). We construct equilateral triangle DEF on DE, so DF = EF (by Prop 1). Now compare triangles ADF and AEF. Side AD = side AE (by construction). Side DF = side EF (equilateral triangle DEF). Side AF = side AF (shared—it's the same line segment). By SSS (Proposition 8), △ADF ≅ △AEF. Corresponding angles of congruent triangles are equal, so ∠DAF = ∠EAF. Therefore line AF bisects ∠DAE, which is the same as ∠BAC. ✓

Key Moves

  1. Choose any point D on one side of the angle
  2. Mark point E on the other side so AD = AE (Proposition 3)—this is our first equal pair
  3. Construct equilateral triangle DEF on segment DE (Proposition 1)—this gives us DF = EF, our second equal pair
  4. Draw line AF—this is the shared side, our third equal pair (AF = AF)
  5. We now have three pairs: AD = AE, DF = EF, AF = AF
  6. By SSS (Proposition 8), △ADF ≅ △AEF
  7. Therefore ∠DAF = ∠EAF (corresponding angles of congruent triangles) ✓

Try It Yourself

Draw a wide angle (say about 120 degrees) and perform the construction: equal lengths on both sides, equilateral triangle, connect to the vertex. Now try it on a very narrow angle (about 20 degrees). Does the construction still work? What about a right angle—does your bisector look like 45 degrees?

Proof Challenge

Available Justifications

1.

Given: ∠BAC. Take an arbitrary point D on AB.

Drag justification
2.

Cut off AE from AC such that AE = AD

Drag justification
3.

Join DE

Drag justification
4.

Construct equilateral triangle DEF on DE

Drag justification
5.

Join AF

Drag justification
6.

In triangles ADF and AEF: AD = AE, DF = EF, AF = AF (common). Therefore △ADF ≅ △AEF by SSS.

Drag justification
7.

Therefore ∠DAF = ∠EAF — the angle ∠BAC is bisected by AF.

Drag justification
0 of 7 steps completed

Curriculum Materials

Get the Teaching Materials

Structured lesson plan, student worksheet, and answer key for Proposition 9.

  • Lesson Plan (prop-09-lesson-plan.pdf)
  • Student Worksheet (prop-09-worksheet.pdf)
  • Answer Key (prop-09-answer-key.pdf)
Browse Curriculum Bundles

Why It Matters

Angle bisection is a fundamental construction. It lets us divide any angle in half using only compass and straightedge. This is essential for many later constructions.

Modern connection: Angle bisectors appear in optics (light reflection), in design (symmetric patterns), and in navigation. The angle bisector of a triangle has special properties—it divides the opposite side proportionally.

Historical note: The ancient Greeks were very interested in angle trisection (dividing into thirds), which turns out to be IMPOSSIBLE with compass and straightedge alone. Bisection is easy; trisection is provably impossible!

Discussion Questions

  • Why does creating an equilateral triangle help us bisect the angle?
  • Could you bisect an angle if you only had a straightedge (no compass)?
  • Why is angle TRIsection (dividing into three) so much harder than bisection?
Euclid's Original Proof
Given: Angle BAC to be bisected.

Construction: Take any point D on AB [Post. 1]. Cut off AE from AC equal to AD [I.3]. Join DE [Post. 1]. Construct equilateral triangle DEF on DE [I.1]. Join AF [Post. 1].

Claim: AF bisects angle BAC.

Proof: In triangles ADF and AEF:
- AD = AE (by construction)
- DF = EF (sides of equilateral triangle)
- AF is common

Therefore △ADF ≅ △AEF by SSS [I.8].

Hence ∠DAF = ∠EAF.

Therefore AF bisects angle BAC.

Q.E.F.

What's Next

We can now bisect any angle. The natural companion question: can we bisect a line segment—find its exact midpoint? Proposition 10 shows how, and the trick is surprisingly elegant: build an equilateral triangle on the segment, then bisect the top angle. The bisector drops straight to the midpoint.